The New Mobility Map: Where Talent Wants to Go (and Where It Doesn’t)

News Article

For years, there were a handful of locations that appeared on almost every mobility dashboard. London. Amsterdam. Zurich. New York. Singapore. If a company needed talent, these were often the obvious destinations. Great infrastructure, strong economies, international communities, and plenty of opportunity. But lately, we feel like the map is changing. Not necessarily because these locations have become less attractive. More because they have become harder.

Take the Netherlands, for example. We live here, so perhaps we notice it more than most. Housing shortages have become a major challenge. Finding suitable accommodation is often one of the biggest concerns for relocating employees. Similar challenges are being reported in markets such as the UK and Germany, where rising housing costs continue to put pressure on assignment budgets.

The same applies to many traditionally popular destinations. Employees still want opportunities abroad, but they are asking different questions. Can I find housing? Can my partner work? What will childcare cost? What happens if I decide I don’t want to stay for five years? Quality of life still matters. In some ways, it matters more than ever. At the same time, we’re seeing increased interest in destinations that weren’t always at the top of relocation wish lists.

Portugal continues to attract international talent thanks to its lifestyle, climate, and growing business ecosystem. Spain is seeing strong growth in foreign-born populations. Ireland remains attractive for international employers, while countries such as Canada continue to actively attract skilled workers.

In the Middle East, places like the UAE and Saudi Arabia are attracting investment, talent, and global projects. Meanwhile, parts of Eastern Europe are becoming increasingly interesting due to competitive costs and growing talent pools.

What we find interesting is that the conversation is becoming less about prestige and more about practicality. Ten years ago, an assignment in a famous global city was often enough to generate excitement. Today, employees are doing their homework. They are comparing cost of living, international schools, housing availability, healthcare, remote work flexibility, and career opportunities for partners and who can blame them?

Moving internationally is a big decision. People aren’t just evaluating a role anymore. They’re evaluating a lifestyle. We also think companies are becoming more pragmatic. With budgets under pressure, many organizations are looking beyond the traditional mobility hotspots. Research suggests that cost considerations remain one of the biggest drivers of mobility decisions, with many companies actively exploring alternative locations that offer a better balance between affordability and access to talent.

For mobility professionals, this creates an interesting challenge. The destinations that are easiest to sell internally may not be the destinations employees are most excited about. And the locations employees love may not always fit the budget. Finding the right balance is becoming part of the job.

One thing feels clear though, the global mobility map is becoming more diverse. The same handful of destinations won’t dominate the conversation forever. Talent has more choices. Companies have more choices, and perhaps, that’s exactly what makes this such an interesting time to work in mobility.